Basic tools in the state of the art
Introducing argumentation schemes
Argument from position to know and expert opinion
Enthymemes, schemes, and critical questions
Argument diagramming tools
Where do we go from here?
Schemes for argument from analogy, classification, and precedent
The case of the drug-sniffing dog
Argument from analogy as treated in logic textbooks
Is argument from analogy deductive or inductive?
Schemes for argument from analogy
Argument from analogy as a defeasible form of argument
Arguments from classification
Argument from precedent and practical argument from analogy
The case of the drug-sniffing dog again
Knowledge-related, practical, and other schemes
Lack-of-knowledge arguments
Arguments from consequences
Arguments from alternatives and opposites
Pleas for help and excuses
Composition and division arguments
Pleas for help and excuses
Composition and division arguments
Attacking verbal classification and slippery slope arguments
Arguments from generally accepted opinions, commitment, and character
Arguments from popular opinion
Variants of the basic form
Arguments from inconsistency
Circumstantial ad hominem
Ad hominem strategies to rebut a personal attack
Casual argumentation schemes
Argument from cause to effect
Argument from effect to cause
Argument from correlation to cause
Casual argumentation at stages of an investigation
Casual assertions as defeasible
Toward a system of analysis and classification
Dialectical and Bayesian models of casual argumentation
Preliminary discussion of the problem
Limitations of deductive analysis
Use of argumentation schemes in analysis
Use of schemes in analyzing weak arguments
The dialectical component of the Enthymeme machine
Attack, rebuttal, and refutation
Attacking, questioning, rebutting, and refuting
Older theories of refutation
Argumentation schemes and critical questions
Toward a pragmatic theory of refutation
Different kinds of opposition
Internal and external refutation
A case study of combined rebuttals
The problem of argument from opposites
Problems about critical questions and refutations
From Abelard to the thirteenth century
Topics in the Renaissance and the Port Royal logic
Modern theories of schemes
A user's compendium of schemes
Argument from position to know
Argument from expert opinion
Argument from popular opinion (and subtypes)
Argument from popular practice
Practical reasoning from analogy
Argument from composition
Argument from oppositions
Rhetorical argument from oppositions
Argument from alternatives
Argument from verbal classification
Argument from definition to verbal classification
Argument from vagueness of a verbal classification
Argument from arbitrariness of a verbal classification
Argument from interaction of act and person
Argument from the group and its members
Two-person practical reasoning
Epistemic argument from ignorance
Argument from cause to effect
Argument from correlation to cause
Abductive argumentation scheme
Argument from evidence to a hypothesis
Argument from consequences
Pragmatic argument from alternatives
Argument from fear appeal
Argument from danger appeal
Argument from need for help
Argument from inconsistent commitment
Circumstantial ad hominem
Precedent slippery slope argument
Sorites slippery slope argument
Verbal slippery slope argument
Full slippery slope argument
Argument for constitutive-rule claims
Argument for an exceptional case
Argument from plea for excuse
Refining the classification of schemes
A proposed general system for classification of schemes
Classification of ad hominem schemes
The defeasible modus ponens form of schemes
Elements of a formalization of schemes in the Carneades system
Formally modeling the critical questions
The argument interchange format
The research project for developing a formal system
Summary of the dialectical system ASD
A worked example of a dialogue in ASD
Schemes in computer systems
Schemes in interagent communication
Schemes in automated reasoning
Schemes in computational applications
